Introduction: Osteoporosis is a disease of
the bone that results from the loss of calcium and other
materials from the skeleton, leaving bones with altered
structure, less density, and less strength. This process
results in an increased risk for fractures, which not only
affects quality of life but also may result in fatal
consequences.
The impact osteoporosis has on our
society can hardly be overstated. Among Caucasian women over
the age of 50, 17% are found to have osteoporosis, while an
additional 42% can be classified as having "low bone mass"
(referred to as osteopenia). In Caucasian men, 4% are
osteoporotic, while an additional 33% are osteopenic. These
figures are somewhat lower among other ethnic groups.
At present, 40% of women and 13% of men
over the age of 50 are expected to sustain a fracture in
their lifetime due to low bone mass. Annually, we see
approximately 1.3 million fractures due to osteoporosis in
the United States, and in 1995, $13.8 billion dollars were
spent on osteoporotic fractures. This amount exceeds the
annual cost of treating asthma and is nearly that of the
annual expense of treating heart failure. Roughly half of
all women over the age of 50 who sustain a hip fracture will
lose their ability to function independently, and women over
the age of 65 have an approximate 25% mortality rate within
one year of fracturing their hip. After menopause, a woman
has a greater chance of dying from the consequences of an
osteoporotic fracture than from breast, uterine, and ovarian
cancer combined.
Features of
Osteoporosis: Osteoporosis is a silent illness.
It can be likened to high blood pressure or elevated
cholesterol levels, neither of which cause symptoms but can
result in an increased risk for heart attacks and strokes.
In the same way, osteoporosis causes no symptoms until it
causes complications – namely fractures.
The most common sites of osteoporotic
fractures are the vertebrae of the spine, followed by the
hip and the wrist. Osteoporotic fractures often occur with
little to no injury. They may occur spontaneously, after a
fall, or following a lifting injury.
Only 1/3 of all vertebral fractures
cause symptoms and are found incidentally on x-ray studies;
the remainder can be very painful. As vertebrae fracture, a
loss of height commonly occurs and may result in changes in
posture and the commonly described "dowager’s hump" along
the upper back. Vertebral fractures only result in a mild
increase in mortality, and wrist fractures have no effect on
mortality, but both have a significant impact on quality of
life. Hip fractures, on the other hand, significantly impair
both quality of life and survival, as mentioned above.
Risk factors for osteoporosis include
female gender, Caucasian or Asian race, advanced age,
slender build, low dietary intake of calcium, family history
of osteoporosis, and smoking. Other factors that can
adversely affect bone density include use of certain
medications such as corticosteroids, hormonal imbalances
(low testosterone, elevated levels of hormones from adrenal
or parathyroid glands), and excessive alcohol intake.
Secondary causes of osteoporosis should be sought in younger
individuals or males found to have low bone mass.
Diagnosis: The
most accurate and widely available method for detecting
osteoporosis is known as bone densitometry.
Techniques used for bone densitometry vary and may include
quantitative computerized tomography (CT) and ultrasound,
but the most commonly used modality is dual-energy x-ray
absorptiometry (DEXA).
A DEXA scan is quick, painless,
involves minimal radiation exposure, and yields valuable
information concerning bone density and subsequent fracture
risk. The spine and hip are the most common areas imaged,
but certain machines have the capability of measuring bone
density in the wrist or calculating a total body
measurement. For the most part, however, assessing bone
density of the spine and hip is sufficient to screen for
osteoporosis.
Two numbers are calculated from a DEXA
scan: a T-score, which compares bone density to young
adult female averages, and a Z-score, which compares
a patient to averages for the same age, gender, and race. It
is the T-score that is used to diagnose osteoporosis. A
T-score of < -2.5 is classified as osteoporosis,
while a score of -1.0 to -2.4 is considered osteopenia, and
anything above -1.0 is normal. There are many reasons that
the Z-score is less useful; for example, a "normal" bone
density reading for an 80 year old female imparts a
significant risk for fracture. The Z-score may be most
useful when <-2.0, which suggests that a secondary cause of
low bone mass needs to be investigated.
Quantitative CT is less commonly
employed and can only provide information about bone density
in the spine, but this method eliminates the problem of bone
spurs, which may falsely elevate bone density readings on a
DEXA scan. Some DEXA machines are now equipped with software
to perform lateral vertebral measurements and this too may
minimize this problem. Ultrasound is performed on the heel,
is very rapid, inexpensive, and can estimate fracture risks
at other sites. Because ultrasound values correlate poorly
with those performed at other sites, however, pursuing a
formal DEXA study is usually recommended when making
decisions about therapy.
Bone density measurement is recommended
for: 1) all individuals with "low energy" fractures (simple
falls, etc.), 2) women entering menopause with additional
risk factors for osteoporosis, 3) all women over the age of
65, 4) men over the age of 70, 5) those planning long-term
steroid therapy or other medications that may cause bone
loss, 6) those making decisions about whether to start
therapy to prevent bone loss, and 7) monitoring the effects
of therapy for low bone mass.
Plain x-rays may demonstrate evidence
for prior fractures and can demonstrate bones that appear
less dense, but by the time these changes are detectable by
x-rays alone, a substantial amount of bone mineral has
already been lost. For this reason, plain x-ray alone is a
poor screening tool for osteoporosis and is not recommended.
Therapy: Treating
osteoporosis involves stopping the net loss of bone mineral
that is occurring. Osteoporosis occurs when more material is
being taken away, or resorbed, from bone that what is
being put into the bone. If we can slow down bone mineral
being taken away (resorption) or increase bone
mineral being added (formation), bone density will
increase.
Decisions about the intensity of
therapy are typically best made on the basis of DEXA or
other bone density measurements, in addition to other
defined risk factors. In an individual who is felt to be at
low risk for ongoing loss of bone density and who has a
T-score of >-1.0, maintaining an adequate intake of calcium
and vitamin D is sufficient. Those who clearly have
osteoporosis (T score < -2.5) warrant the use of more
aggressive intervention. For those with relatively normal
bone density or mild osteopenia, factoring in other risk
factors helps clarify the need for therapy. The "FRAX"
calculation is a tool that has been developed over the last
several years that considers gender, body mass index, race,
smoking history, family history, corticosteroid use, and the
presence or absence of rheumatoid arthritis or other
secondary causes to estimate a ten year fracture risk. If
this risk is determined to be > 20% for major osteoporotic
fractures or > 3% for hip fractures or if there are existing
fragility fractures, more aggressive treatment is indicated.
Because of the risk of osteoporosis imposed by chronic
corticosteroid therapy, it also may be advisable to treat
with certain medications on a preventative basis if
long-term therapy (> 3 months) is anticipated, depending
again on the patient’s baseline fracture risk profile.
Exercise has beneficial effects on
bone density by stimulating "remodeling" of bone. Low-impact
activities such as walking or gentle running are preferred.
Exercise has the additional benefit of improving muscle
tone, which helps prevent falls.
Calcium and vitamin D
supplementation is the first step in treating and
preventing osteoporosis. During years of skeletal growth
until peak bone mass is achieved around the age of 35, an
adequate calcium intake of 1,000 mg/day and vitamin D 400
units/day is important to build strong bones. The first few
years after menopause are characterized by rapid loss of
bone mineral, and at that point 1,200 to 1,500 mg/day of
calcium and 800 units or more of vitamin D are recommended.
Similar recommendations are made for those taking
corticosteroids and older men.
Because of the rising prevalence of
vitamin D deficiency in the population at large and the
mounting health risks that are associated with low vitamin D
levels, measurement of a serum vitamin D level in the lab is
an essential component in planning therapy for a patient
with low bone mass. Low baseline levels of vitamin D often
require higher amounts than the above recommendations, at
least until vitamin D levels are increased to an acceptable
range.
Dairy products and some orange
juice preparations are good dietary sources of calcium,
while carbonated beverages with high phosphate content
generally result in loss of calcium from bones. Calcium
supplements over the counter containing calcium carbonate or
calcium citrate in combination with vitamin D provide
additional protection. If added to a reasonable diet, 2 to 3
tablets of a calcium and vitamin D combination supplement
are usually sufficient to provide for one’s daily needs.
While some brands of calcium may attempt to claim
superiority over others, it is not so much the form of
calcium but the amount of calcium that is important.
Estrogen replacement
therapy, given in form of pills or patches, prevents the
loss of bone mineral that occurs after menopause, and when
begun after the age of 65 may increase bone density by as
much as 5-10%. Studies have documented lower vertebral
fractures and suggested lower hip fracture rates in women
taking estrogen.
Recent widely publicized data,
however, has shown an increased risk of blood clots and
heart attacks in women taking estrogen, particularly in
those with other risk factors such as smoking. There has
also been a longstanding concern about the risk of breast
cancer with estrogen. When this information became
available, many women stopped taking their estrogen
preparations without discussing this matter with the
prescribing physician. The unfortunate consequence of this
decision is that bone density drops rapidly after estrogen
is discontinued. Women should have a frank discussion with
their doctors about the pros and cons of taking estrogen as
well as alternatives to such therapy to prevent bone loss
and the complications that may result if no bone protective
therapy is being given.
Bisphosphonates are
medications that powerfully inhibit resorption of bone. By
doing so, bone density increases over time. Currently
available medications in this class include alendronate (Fosamax),
risedronate (Actonel), ibandronate (Boniva), and zoledronic
acid (Reclast). All of these agents increase bone density in
both the spine and the hip, but more importantly reduce
fracture risk at both of these sites by as much as 50%
within 6 months of starting therapy (hip fracture protection
has not been documented as of yet with Boniva). Fosamax,
Actonel, and Boniva can all be given orally, and while daily
dosing regimens are available, most patients prefer to take
these drugs weekly (Fosamax and Actonel) or monthly (Actonel
and Boniva) for convenience. Intravenous administration is
an option when using Reclast (given once per year) or Boniva
(given every 3 months).
Because these drugs must be well
absorbed when administered orally, they are taken on an
empty stomach first thing in the morning, and it is
recommended that no food or other medications be given until
at least 30 minutes later. Some individuals experience an
upset stomach or possibly even some damage to the stomach
lining, which is minimized by taking these drugs with a full
glass of water in the upright position. Patients with
strictures in their esophagus who have difficulty swallowing
pills may not be good candidates for the pill form of these
medications but could still take the liquid form of Fosamax.
The intravenous bisphosphonates
Reclast and Boniva eliminate the problems of absorption and
stomach irritation and can be offered to patients with
osteoporosis as first-line therapies, barring potential
insurance coverage restrictions. With both therapies, there
is a potential for infusion reactions, which can consist of
flu-like symptoms of aching, fever, or headache. When
present, these symptoms generally last a few days are less
common with subsequent infusions than after the initial dose
of the medication. Taking acetaminophen (Tylenol) on a
scheduled basis for 24-48 hours after the infusion minimizes
the possibility of such reactions. Health care providers
also must be careful to check baseline kidney function and
calcium levels before starting these drugs, as with other
bisphosphonates.
There has been much press recently
about a rare complication of bisphosphonates known as
osteonecrosis of the mandible as well as a possible
associations of a heart rhythm disturbance known as atrial
fibrillation and "atypical hip fractures" in patients taking
long-term bisphosphonates.
Osteonecrosis of the mandible is
defined as an area of the jaw bone that dies off due to lack
of blood supply. It can be treated by cleaning out the bone
and simply allowing the area to heal. This complication is
much more commonly described in cancer patients taking much
higher doses of bisphosphonates that what we use to treat
osteoporosis but rarely occurs in osteoporosis patients as
well. Patients experiencing this complication most commonly
had recent dental extractions, so any planned oral surgery
should be arrange prior to starting these drugs, and in some
cases an exam by a dentist may be recommended. Still, this
event appears to be quite rare and can occur in patients who
are not taking these drugs. For example, in one trial
studying Reclast, there were nearly 8,000 patients evenly
divided into active treatment and placebo; one patient
receiving Reclast and one patient in the placebo group
developed osteonecrosis of the mandible.
The concern over atrial
fibrillation and atypical hip fractures arose from studies
and case reports that seemed to demonstrate an increased
rate of these events in patients taking bisphosphonates.
When reviewed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA),
neither was believed to represent a true association with
this class of medications.
For most patients, bisphosphonates
are safe and effective drugs, and given the dire
consequences and prevalence of fragility fractures, the risk
to benefit ratio tips in favor of using these medications in
the vast majority of patients with osteoporosis and a number
of patients with osteopenia as well.
Raloxifene (Evista)
is a medication that acts as a "selective estrogen receptor
modifier," producing the positive effects of estrogens on
bone, while avoiding the negative effects of estrogen on
breast tissue and possibly avoiding the increased risk of
heart attacks from estrogen. Given in pill form once daily
without the requirement of an empty stomach, Evista has been
shown to increase bone density in both the spine and hip,
but has only been shown to reduce fractures in the spine. It
is possible that hip fractures are reduced as well, but
studies to date may not have included enough patients to
demonstrate such an effect. A small increase in blood clots
may be seen with Evista, but beneficial effects are seen in
cholesterol levels, and it is possible that this agent may
actually reduce the risk of breast cancer (studies to
confirm this effect are underway).
Teriparatide (Forteo) is a
derivative of a hormone in the body known as parathyroid
hormone (PTH). This hormone stimulates both bone formation
and bone resorption, and depending on how much is present,
bone density either increases or decreases. Forteo is
designed to favor bone formation, and is the only available
treatment for osteoporosis that works in this way (all other
medications work mostly to inhibit bone resorption). It is
given in a once daily injection and while costly, assistance
programs to Medicare recipients are readily available.
Forteo increases bone density in
both the spine and the hip but has only been shown to reduce
vertebral fractures. Moreover, this agent may become less
effective when given continuously for over 2 years. While
many physicians hoped that Forteo could be given in
combination with bisphosphonates for additional benefit,
studies have shown no more benefit when combining these
therapies than when using either agent alone.
Calcitonin is also a
hormone normally made by the body that blocks bone
resorption. It is most commonly given in the form of a nasal
spray once daily and is associated with minimal side
effects. The gains in bone density seen with this agent,
however, are less than what are seen with other therapies
and beneficial effects are only observed in the spine.
Nonetheless, vertebral fractures are reduced when using this
medication long-term and it does have a role in treating
osteoporosis in patients unable to take other medications.
Novel agents for treating
osteoporosis include inhibitors of RANK-ligand,
osteoprotegerin, and strontium. Both osteoprotegerin and
RANK-ligand inhibitors appear to be involved in the balance
between bone formation and resorption, representing another
method for reducing fractures. While osteoprotegerin is in
early stages of development, a RANK-ligand inhibitor known
as denosumab (Prolia) has recently been approved for the
treatment of post-menopausal osteoporosis. This drug is
given as a subcutaneous injection every 6 months, and
studies have documented that Prolia increases bone density
and reduces fractures in the spine and hip, offering yet
another option for osteoporosis therapy. Safety concerns
include increased risk of infection, and rare cases of
osteonecrosis of the mandible have been reported with this
drug, similar to what is reported with bisphosphonate
therapy. Strontium is a medication given orally that both
increases bone formation while decreasing resorption. This
agent appears to increase bone density in the spine and the
hip as well as reducing vertebral fractures. Strontium is
used in Europe but not FDA approved in the United States.
Vertebroplasty and
kyphoplasty are procedures that are now available for
treating symptomatic vertebral compression fractures. Both
involve the insertion of a catheter into the collapsed
vertebra under x-ray guidance. With vertebroplasty, a
cement-like material is injected into the vertebra to
provide stability and reduce pain, while kyphoplasty
involves first inflating the vertebra with a balloon before
injecting with cement. Kyphoplasty has the additional
benefit of improving postural changes, but is not clearly
superior to vertebroplasty alone in improving outcomes. When
using these methods, experienced centers are necessary, and
after completion of these procedures, it is essential to
pursue medical therapy to prevent future fractures.
Monitoring the effects of therapy
is necessary to determine whether the medication is having
its desired effect on bone density. DEXA scans performed
every 1 to 2 years are usually adequate to assess whether
bone density is being maintained, or hopefully increased.
While important, increases in bone density explain only a
fraction of fracture reduction in patients on certain
therapies (bisphosphonates, for example). Small gains in
bone density may result in large reductions in fracture
risk.
Because of the time needed to see a
meaningful change in bone density, urine markers of "bone
turnover" are available and may demonstrate positive effects
within a few months of beginning osteoporosis therapy. The
most common test run is a urinary "N-telopeptide," which is
best collected on the second urination of the morning. This
level is often elevated in those with ongoing risk for
future loss of bone density but is suppressed when
medications designed to inhibit resorption have their
desired effect.
Because osteoporosis therapy has to
be given continuously over long periods of time and does not
typically result in improvement in symptoms, it is often
difficult to encourage patients remain on their medications.
Adherence to the plan of treatment, however, prevents
complications and should result in a greater overall
quality, and perhaps duration, of life.